Boosting literacy through oral language

In an effort to boost not only reading comprehension, but also the confidence to present an answer, we are increasing the amount of oral work students are doing.

We are attempting this in multiple ways including performing plays and regular oral presentations for IRL (in real life), and screen casting and FlipGrids for the online component.

Using FlipGrid and screen casting allows students to actively consolidate their thoughts and understanding through preparation to provide a well scripted exposition.

Off the cuff oral presentations and performing in front of their peers improves the confidence to communicate ideas. At the very least, presenting and performing will help desensitise students to being in front of a crowd, which in itself can be a crushing fear.

Basic Facts gaps

And here we are talking about one of the other major gaps in our students' knowledge; basic facts. How does one address a gap in knowledge caused by lack of exposure and practise at a time when homework is considered "ineffective", there is less time for parents to be involved in their children's learning, and there are much more compelling activities than in the past?

One way of addressing the gap in basic facts knowledge is to increase exposure to everyday. This is done through use of simple flash cards and randomly going through about ten or so at a time. The series of flash cards was simple enough to produce using Google Slides.

Another way I have implemented with the higher ability learners is to do a Basic Facts quiz before every lesson. Students are automatically given immediate feedback on the correct answers, so the quiz also becomes a feedback based learning tool. After everyone has finished the quiz, I also briefly go over the questions that seemed to cause problems for many of the learners.

The quiz method had rapid increase in recall ability, initially starting with many students scoring in the low teens out of twenty and now most scoring above 25 out of 30.

Phonics, decoding, and spelling

One issue we have across the board (but especially for our target learners) in LS1 is the ability to decode and pronounce new words along with spelling already known words. In an effort to alleviate this we have instigated a phonics programme.

The phonics programme is based on Yolanda Soryl's phonics professional development course Grant and I both attended. While we have both taught phonics previously Soryl's programme consolidates many of the phonics practises and concepts into a coherent course based in New Zealand accents.

After an inconsistent start, we have found a place for a phonics lesson within our unconventional schedule. Perhaps one of the most powerful practises, though, is continual exposure and practise through the days and weeks. A particularly good strategy is bringing up phonics at random points throughout the day.

Place value rears its ugly head again.

As I suspected, Place Value became a noticeable issue again when trying to teach how to use Place Value as a subtraction strategy in week 3 of term 2.

This time, I took a different strategy with the stick counting method. I assigned each colour a particular value coinciding with the different place values from ones to 100 000s. Learners used the valued sticks to create numbers and solve increasingly difficult subtraction problems. See the task here.

Assigning sticks a different value per colour is an adaptation of an idea gained from my study of the Ancient Egyptian and Chinese Number Systems compared to other number systems including the modern Place Value system. The idea being that the colours provide a visual cue for the worth of each place value as the Chinese characters and Egyptian hieroglyphs do.

Keeping numbers organised in their discrete place values also forces the user to exchange sticks for usable sticks when subtracting beyond the means of the value being subtracted. For example when doing the subtraction 12 - 7, seven ones can't be taken from 2 ones, thus forcing the ten to be exchanged for 10 ones. Incidentally, discussing these place values, subtraction, exchanging, and breaking etc. exposes learners to the vocabulary needed to truly understand the written algorithm.

The lessons were successful with most, if not all, learners picking up enough understanding of Place Value to use it as a strategy for addition and subtraction from 3 or 4 digit numbers and higher. One of the two learners that did not pick it up to the 3 digit level is noted for their absence and lack of engagement in school.

A Gap in Knowledge

Back in Term 1 with IKAN testing finished and analysed for gaps in knowledge for the group as a whole, it was time to get into serious teaching. Unexpectedly, Place Value was the largest gap with Basic Facts close by. More on Basic Facts here and later (link retroactively added).

To address the Place Value gap in the higher ability learners, I went back to grouping sticks and recording numbers on a sheet. I made sure to have the learners add on 10 and 100 in the hopes they would notice the jump up in place value of particular numbers.

The task was mildly successful. I noticed about a half of my learners understood quite quickly, whereas the other half or so didn't. In the second week of working on Place Value, I extended those with an understanding to go down into the decimal place values. At the time I had suspicions on how well it was taken up. These suspicions turned out to be true

What the Data Says

As eluded to in the previous post we are selecting 2 groups for our collaborative inquiry this year.

Collaborative Inquiry

With the change in direction of the cluster and school with PLD, preconceived ideas and the group of student in LS1 we decided to run a collaborative inquiry this year.

What does this mean??

We will target oral language through Reading, Writing and Maths.
We are also focusing on improving Maths attainment through integrated topics using the HPE, Arts and Oral language curriculums.

The way the majority of content is covered is in differentiated groups. This will mean the target groups get "hit" from all different directions, from both teachers throughout the year.

We are also going to have 2 focus groups.  One group which teachers traditionally always focus on, the group who are "nearly" there but need a push. The second group is going to be a group that is operating ahead of where they need to be.

The rational behind this is to give a wider range of approaches a go, and to keep ourselves thinking, reflecting and planning throughout all lessons. An observation of previous years inquiries was that too much focus was put in to a specific area. This in turn frustrated us as there seemed to be no escaping the pattern of focusing below the chronological level and when shifts weren't obvious teaching self esteem suffered.